• Yi Ke

A New Sick Leave Requirement: COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Paid Sick Leave Program

Updated: Jul 26, 2021

Under Chapter 16 of the Acts of 2021, from May 28, 2021, the employers are required to provide employees up to 40 hours of COVID-19 Massachusetts Emergency Paid Sick Leave (MA EPSL) when the employees are unable to work due to specific qualifying reasons related to the pandemic. The MA EPSL is effective until the earlier of Sept. 30 or until reimbursement funds are depleted.


Under MA EPSL provisions, such sick leave benefit is in addition to existing paid time-off benefits offered by employers or required by law (such as earned sick time), subject to some limited exceptions. While all employers (except the federal government) must provide the MA EPSL, they are eligible to be reimbursed for the costs of MA EPSL from a newly established state fund.


Qualifying Reasons for Leave


Under the MA EPSL, all employees are able to take the leave if it is due to following reasons:[1]

  1. an employee’s need to:

  2. self-isolate and care for themself because they have been diagnosed with COVID-19;

  3. get a medical diagnosis, care, or treatment for COVID-19 symptoms; or

  4. get or recover from a COVID-19 immunization;

  5. an employee’s need to care for a family member who:

  6. must self-isolate due to a COVID-19 diagnosis; or

  7. needs medical diagnosis, care, or treatment for COVID-19 symptoms;

  8. a quarantine order or similar determination regarding the employee by a local, state, or federal public official, a health authority having jurisdiction, or a health care provider;

  9. an employee’s need to care for a family member due to a quarantine order or similar determination regarding the family member by a local, state, or federal public official, a health authority having jurisdiction, the family member’s employer, or a health care provider; or

  10. an employee’s inability to telework due to COVID-19 symptoms.

  11. Note that, in general, employers may not require employees to use other types of available paid leave before they use COVID-19 emergency paid sick leave. Similarly, employers may not require employees to search for or find a replacement worker to cover the time the employee will miss while using COVID-19 emergency paid sick leave


Amount of Leaves


The Employers shall provide the duration of the leave based on the working hours of the employee per week. [2]


1. Employees working 40 hours or more per week are entitled to 40 hours of MA EPSL.

2. Employees who regularly work fewer than 40 hours per week, employers must provide leave in an amount that is equal to the average number of hours that such employee works per week.

3. Employees whose schedule and weekly hours vary from week to week, employers must provide leave that is equal to the average number of hours that the employee was scheduled to work per week over the previous 6-months.

4. If an employee with a variable schedule has not worked for the employer for 6 months, the employer must provide leave that is equal to the number of hours per week that the employee reasonably expected to work when hired.

5. The maximum amount an employer is required to pay per employee, and the maximum amount for which the employer may seek reimbursement for any one employee, is $850 (including cost of benefits).


Employees are required to provide notice to employers of the need for MA EPSL as soon as practicable or foreseeable. And Employers are required to provide a copy to all employees and post a notice regarding MA EPSL.


For more information on how to apply for reimbursement and details of the MA EPSL, please visit https://www.mass.gov/info-details/covid-19-temporary-emergency-paid-sick-leave-program.


[1] https://www.mass.gov/info-details/covid-19-temporary-emergency-paid-sick-leave-program [2] https://www.mass.gov/info-details/covid-19-temporary-emergency-paid-sick-leave-program

12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

近来,我们收到了很多关于竞业禁止法律的问题,如今便借此篇文章来谈一谈一些需要重点注意的地方。显然,马萨诸塞州在2018年十月的竞业禁止改革(MNAA)对任何在马萨诸塞州有员工的雇主都具有广泛的影响。虽然雇主仍然可以对大多数员工使用竞业限制协议,但如今的法律需要雇主使用新的方法来起草、实施和执行这些协议。业内普遍认为更加严格和紧缩的新法律的实行,会大幅减少竞业禁止协议在麻省的应用。 首先,新的法律使

LION’S LAW P.C. 2022年2月10 日 最近有公司客户来电咨询,公司有意辞退一名表现不佳的员工,但该员工突然声称自己有精神障碍,公司经理询问在这样的情况下辞退该员工是否存在对残障人士的不当解雇的风险。 在美国,政府一向很重视对残障人士权益的保障,不论是身体上的还是精神上的。1990 年的美国残疾人法案 (ADA) 和《马萨诸塞州公平就业实践法》保护了有身体或精神障碍的员工、有身体或

近日,麻州最高法院就 CHARLES M. LIEBER vs. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE & another 一案作出判决。本案中,原告查尔斯·M·利伯 (Charles M. Lieber) 就初步禁令动议被驳回提出上诉。在该动议中,利伯试图要求其雇主(哈佛大学)根据赔偿政策, 为其支付在面临刑事指控时所产生的律师费和开支。法院得出结论,